Profile picture
1
Appreciate
17 comments

Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide

Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide
“There will be, in the next generation or so, a Pharmacological [Adjunct to Propaganda, Brainwashing] Method of MAKING people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of Painless Concentration Camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather ENJOY it, because they will be distracted from any desire to *rebel [peacefully IDENTIFY and personally Secede from And Re-Associate with ALTERNATIVES to] propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution*.” – Aldous Huxley

 

Comments
  • Profile photo of Sean Lynch

    Sean LynchDecember 17, 2015 , 4:33 pm0

    …The reasons Mal cites for hating Bill Gates are all either false, not actually reasons for hating him if you’re not a disciple of a Penthouse Pet and a discredited liar, or true and either exaggerated or fail to outweigh the massive amount of good he’s done in the world.

 

 

Profile photo of PG (Pierre-Guy) VeerPG (Pierre-Guy) Veer
pg.veer@gmail.com
127.0.0.1

HE surely could have done more, but singling him out is dishonest. Yes, he is successful in many ways, but why should HE be the altruistic one? Why can’t he do selfish things HE likes?

 

Profile photo of Mal Roarke

Mal Roarke December 22, 2015

I do NOT “hate” people, but I may make an exception for people–such as Sean Lynch–who like to misquote me by using words that I did not say or write!

Dear Readers who are more innocent than PG (Pierre-Guy) Veer who ignores facts. This irrationality cannot last forever. Denial of reality will get you early dead.

Nothing to do with ALTRUISM or whether he is or not. That’s a RED HERRING.  PG Veer is FALLING for objectivist line/TRAP that Bill Gates is a HERO.

Hopefully EXTEND your life as long as possible by seeing the facts. Then doing something about it. As best as you can.

If you don’t think there is a problem NO reason to SEEK a Solution and remove your “Sanction of the victim”. – Ayn Rand. So now you see the problem and you are OVERWHELMED? But PG Veer most does NOT see the problem. He won’t be able to provide or suggest  SOLUTIONS

“Why can’t he do SELFISH things HE likes?”

Because they violate the Non-Aggression Principle, that is why!

…The interesting thing about all this is that the campaign to reduce global population through vaccines will obviously NOT impact people who consciously AVOID vaccines. And those individual people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved likelyhood and ability to INDIVIDUALLY INDIRECTLY move human civilization forward–i.e. spontaneous order–with thru methodological individualism and thoughtful prototyped practiced consideration and steps.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, “It’s only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!” (Their words, not mine.)

In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in effect, an “evil genius” kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you’re not too bright and probably don’t engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious we are not alone in the universe.

If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don’t believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, it’s not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don’t even care enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, “unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people” then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we’ve discussed here:“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.

My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you’ll also pass the “universal IQ test” which determines whether you’re smart enough to know that injecting yourbody with chemicals and viral fragments in order to stop “seasonal flu” is a foolish endeavor.

Be healthy and wise, and you’ll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don’t have the intelligence to question what they’re being told to do by their own corrupt governments.

As if corrupt GOVERNMENTS was not threat enough, NOW comes multi-billionaire Bill Gates playing GOD with human lives…

Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population

Reducing the world population through vaccines

This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says “if we do a really great job on new vaccines… we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?”

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction. So is “health care,” which all NaturalNewsreaders already know to be more of a “sick care” system that actually harms more people than it helps.

Perhaps that’s the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html), it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?

Let’s conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn’t be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can’t just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be “effective” from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that’s unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10 – 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This “soft kill” method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don’t quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence thatvaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_vaccines_miscarriage.html).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This “bioweapon” approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.

This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here:http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_seasonal_flu_shot_vaccines.html

Here’s the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259

The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could set up the population for a “hard kill” pandemic that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent, as Bill Gates suggested).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired… all in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the “hard kill” pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all over the world. One such program is researching the development of “sweat-triggered vaccines” that could use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization technologies that have been called a “temporary castration” solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.

Who will be left alive? The smart people

Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population
http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1250#msg1250


This might explain why Bill and Melinda Gates are against saving 800,000 kids a year using DDT…

 

#BillGates #eugenics #psychopath #depopulation #vaccines

Something REALLY Wicked This Way Comes…

As if GOVERNMENT was not threat enough,
NOW comes multi-billionaire Bill Gates playing GOD with human lives…

While reading the following articles, keep in mind that–instead of diabolically KILLING other human beings or UNILATERALLY ruining their reproductive genes, their lives and their futures–the money and effort COULD have been spent on many PRODUCTIVE, USEFUL things. Here are a few that come to my mind:

  • Getting man into space–privately. In space, there is NO “over-population problem”–real or concocted.
  • Funding telomeres research to EXTEND human life, instead of shortening it with eugenics.
  • Curing cancer and other diseases (eliminating malaria HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED using DDT)
  • Electric and hydrogen fueled cars
  • Cheap solar panels for individual homes
  • Low cost energy beamed from satellites
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless energy distribution, such as Tesla demonstrated 100 years ago
  • Low cost, world wide, wireless Wifi internet access
  • Conversion of Uranium power plants to the much safer THORIUM! http://tinyurl.com/THORIUM-energy
  • Making MS Windows stable!! Hell, Gates cannot even keep computer viruses out of his own product. Why is he mucking around with real viruses?

What has Bill Gates done instead? Instead of promoting proven DDT solutions, he has funded fake “research” on malaria while racking up recorded deaths of more than 800,000 children per year. And NOW he is going to use the mosquitoes that he has saved from DDT to infect the rest of us with his genetic experiments.

Where have we encountered this kind of grotesque thinking before?

Mild mannered Bill Gates really IS a monster!

Dennis

Bill Gates surprised by Eugenics question. There is much more in this video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coHf5UEFUl8

[1]. http://tinyurl.com/DDT-vs-Malaria
[2007-04-08.2] “DDT Ban & Malaria: An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED!” — article by Dennis Wilson

  • An article questioning the wasted and misguided efforts of the (Bill & Melinda) Gates Foundation and the complete blackout of the role of DDT in eradicating malaria in the 1960s.
  • The government ban on DDT has caused MORE HUMAN DEATHS since 1970 than ALL the government wars and genocides since the beginning of the 20th Century–and the deaths still continue EVERY DAY! Malaria kills 800,000 children per year, thanks to Government bans on DDT in the 1970s!

Excerpt From the article:”Since they created the Gates Foundation in 1998, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda French Gates, have earmarked hundreds of millions of dollars to develop children’s vaccines, including vaccines to prevent malaria.”

“It might be some years before a vaccine is ready, but new interest in beating an ancient disease has prompted governments and business, private foundations and worldwide organizations, churches and individuals to coordinate efforts to minimize the damage that malaria causes. Thousands of people from the WHO, UNICEF, the Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, and many other groups have taken up the cause.”

An Unnecessary Tragedy, INDEED! And it continues because otherwise intelligent people will not call for the removal of the ban on DDT. They prefer monetary grants to real solutions. Allowing DDT to be used would really upset their grants.

Instead of trying to “squelch the suffering it causes”, which is part of the subtitle and a major focus of Harker’s article, what is so wrong with actual ERADICATION of the CAUSE of the disease? How does one measure human suffering? Is it easier to comfort and treat 17 cases or 800 million cases?

Or perhaps I should “Ask The Right QUESTION”[]: How much grant money can be had for 17 cases of malaria versus 800 million cases?

Thumbnail

2015-12-22 22.42.39

2015-12-22 22.43.54

[2]. http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1250#msg1250

[2010-10-01] Bill Gates says vaccines can help reduce world population

2015-12-22 23.02.53

[3]. http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1253#msg1253

[2012-02-02] Microsoft buys eugenics technology from Merck

  • When you buy Microsoft products, you are now promoting the pharmaceutical industry and its global vaccine agenda. That’s the new reality in which we live, where the world’s largest software company is “in bed” with the world’s largest vaccine pusher.
  • Thumbnail
  • 2015-12-22 22.24.18

[4]. http://dennisleewilson.com/simplemachinesforum/index.php?topic=23.msg1657#msg1657

[2012-07-25] Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide

  • A list of some of the atrocities against humanity Bill Gates has committed in the name of global health.
  • Thumbnail

2015-12-22 22.05.29

Comments Continue Here:

Profile photo of Mal Roarke

Mal Roarke December 21, 2015

INSTEAD of giving Bill Gates a free pass, Roarke chose to write from TWO major perspectives:

I. While reading the articles I provide here, keep in mind that–INSTEAD of diabolically KILLING other human beings or UNILATERALLY ruining their reproductive genes, their lives and their futures–

II. –The money and effort COULD have been spent on many–“massive amount[s] ” of “good”–PRODUCTIVE, USEFUL things.

Here are a few that come to my mind,  which I combine and expand on here via a post to Martin Brock:

Profile photo of Mal Roarke

Mal Roarke December 15, 2015 , 1:36 am1

Re: Martin Brock’s Comments:

“Gates is not a monster as much as he’s a capitalist”.

Already responded. He is a crony of the govt. He is part of fascist system.

Re: Their ecological footprint would be a thousand times higher than Al Gore’s.

Your concern for the whole ecological movement is nothing but cover for collectivist control of individual human action! If you can concoct a reason to accuse me of alleged eco damage you can control me [and others].

[BILL GATES, CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM

by  November 9, 2015
Bill Gates of Microsoft is one of the wealthiest individuals in the world, so when he speaks it is not surprising that the world tends to listen. In a recent interview, Gates has said that capitalism is inherently unable to solve the problem of global warming, and instead there have to be world-encompassing government-business “partnerships” to save Planet Earth. In the November 2015 issue of “Atlantic” magazine, Bill Gates asserts that private enterprisers are too self-interested, too narrowly focused on short-run market profitability, not innovatively-oriented enough, and not sufficiently incentivized to develop on their own the needed alternative energy sources that can eliminate the use of fossil fuels by the middle of the twenty-first century. Thus, the only answer is for governments to design an agenda and a plan of action to direct and subsidize the private enterprises that cannot be trusted to solve what he considers the leading problem facing everyone in the world: climate change and global warming. Bill Gates’ ..]

Re: Extending human life doesn’t help any population problem either…
AND
Re: Getting men into space is hardly a solution to any population problem…
AND
Re: Even the incredibly optimistic Pollyannas at Mars One expect to spend six billion dollars…

Your refusal to see value of space travel and human longevity qualifies you as existing on a DEATH PREMISE.

There are plenty of recent self made billionaires who are already privately funding earth orbit and moon shot.

Money is not the issue, freedom to do it is.

[Even government tax-funded NASA cannot do THIS!
The short video at the end is also good. Dennis

http://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-landed-its-rocket-for-the-first-time-2015-12

SpaceX makes history with the first-ever orbital rocket landing

Re: Solar energy is approaching economic viability in some applications, when fossil fuel prices rise again, but solar power satellites are similarly wishful thinking by science fiction fans always looking for an excuse to do something in space.

Individuals with imagination and dreams make progress. The computer upon which you are reading this was once nothing more than a Sci fi dream. With attitudes like yours it would still be a Sci fi dream. The computer in my hand is magnitudes more powerful and magnitudes less expensive than the computers of the 1940s, which themselves did not even exist in the 1920s.

EVERY advance in human knowledge, innovation, production, engineering, arts, crafts and living standards STARTED in somebody’s imagination–including the computer you are using to view this!

Regarding your wireless networks, I was writing about Tesla’s wireless POWER. Search youtube for Tesla power.

Regarding thorium ENLIGHTEN YOURSELF
http://tinyurl.com/THORIUM-energy

[The North Pacific Ocean has been radioactive for decades! The information was never widely broadcast. The latest disaster changes very little in the Ocean–just more of the same.
It is waaay past time to convert from uranium to thorium.
Dennis

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-19/huge-fukushima-cover-exposed-government-scientists-meltdown

The researchers track Fukushima radiation by focusing on the isotope Cesium-134, which has a half-life of only two years. All Cesium-134 in the ocean likely comes from the Fukushima disaster. In contrast, Cesium-137 – also released in huge quantities from Fukushima – has a half-life of 30 years, and persists in the ocean, not just from Fukushima, but also from nuclear tests conducted as far back as the 1950s.]

 

Comments Continue Here:

Profile photo of Mal Roarke

Mal Roarke December 28, 2015 , 1:36 am1

2015-12-21-12-39-29

The Gates Foundation has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to AGRA, and in 2006 Robert Horsch was hired for the AGRA project. Horsch was a Monsanto executive for 25 years. In a nutshell, THE PROJECT may be sold under the banner of altruism and “sustainability,” but in reality it’s anything but. It’s just a multi-billion dollar enterprise to transform Africa into a GM-crop-friendly continent.

Conflicts of Interest Abound

Gates’ philanthropic methods came under scrutiny back in August 2010, when it was discovered that The Gates Foundation had purchased 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock; dramatically increasing its previous holdings—and hence its financial conflicts of interest—in the biotech firm.


The strong connections to Monsanto cast serious doubt on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s (hundreds of millions of dollars) heavy funding of agricultural development in Africa and purported goal of alleviating poverty and hunger among small-scale farmers. Second, this investment represents an enormous conflict of interests.

It would be naive to think that all these philanthropic collaborations are designed to solve any problem besides how to help Monsanto monopolize the world’s food supply with expensive **patented GM seeds, and the HERBERCIDE to go with them** [and to further Bill Gates global population culling agenda].

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/03/04/clueless-fabrication-on-gmo.aspx

2015-12-28 01.54.12

2015-12-28 02.16.03

2015-12-28 02.16.48

2015-12-28 02.18.01

2015-12-28 01.52.56

Watch “”YES ! GMOs ARE DEFINITELY TOXIC” : DR THIERRY VRAIN” on YouTube

https://youtu.be/kVolljHmqEs

http://m.journal-neo.org/2015/03/24/gates-and-obama-share-a-dark-secret/

Gates and Obama Share a Dark Secret

bill-gates-officeIn 2014 there was the western Africa Ebola hoax where US President Barack Obama, the first black man to be President, announced his “War on Ebola” in September last year, ordering 3,000 US military troops to the region, though reportedly none had experience in public health and no one had produced rigorous laboratory proof of a single person dying from something called Ebola virus. Liberia was among the poorest and most war-torn regions in the world.

Wars over blood diamonds and colonial genocidal tribal wars have left a devastated, mal-nourished population in its wake. Was Ebola simply a panic-maker? Further investigation uncovered the Pentagon was developing an Ebola vaccine with Monsanto and suspicion was that the 3,000 US troops were sent to force the population to become human guinea pigs for the untested substances.

Before that Obama, or more precisely then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in 2011 ordered Libya to be bombed back to the stone-age as what she called “responsibility to protect.” Today, four years after, the country is… [chaos] pure with roving lawless bands killing and looting.

*Now Obama and his Administration, the US Government, have teamed up with “Mr Vaccinate All Africans” Bill Gates, a eugenics protégé and intimate of David Rockefeller. Obama and Gates share a dark secret. They are colluding to contaminate the incredibly rich and productive soils of Africa with GMO, GMO from a company where Gates is a major stockholder, Monsanto.*

USAID, Gates and Monsanto in Africa

A new report was released on February 23 that documents for the first time the stealth methods of the US State Department and USAID, the ostensible Agency for International Development which is intimately tied to the agenda of the CIA and Pentagon’s AFRICOM, together with Monsanto, to push unwanted GMO crops, especially Monsanto GMO maize, on Africancountries.

Haidee Swanby from the African Centre for Biosafety who authored the report stated, “The US, the world’s top producer of GM crops, is seeking new markets for American GM crops in Africa. The US administration’s strategy consists of assisting African nations to produce biosafety laws that promote agribusiness interests instead of protecting Africans from the potential threats of GM crops.”

According to Swanby, USAID has two projects in Africa which “help” various African governments draw up national biosafety laws as such consumer protection is lacking in all but seven African countries. However, USAID in collusion with Monsanto, the world’s largest GMO purveyor, drafts laws that permit insufficiently tested GMO seeds such as Monsanto GMO maize, to be considered “biosafe,” claiming GMO is the solution to African hunger, a brazen lie as no GMO plant on the market today has been modified to increase harvest yield.

Swanby points to the rare case of South Africa which has allowed GMO for the past 16 years:“South African farmers have more than 16 years’ experience cultivating GM maize, soya and cotton, but the promise that GM crops would address food security has not been fulfilled. Indeed, South Africa’s food security is reportedly declining with almost half the nation currently categorized as food insecure even though South Africa exports maize.”

Subverting Cartegena Protocol

In 2003, over the bitter opposition of the US Government, 168 nations adopted what is called the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. It puts the “precautionary principle” as primary—If you have not sufficiently proven safety of GMO and other bio-engineered crops, protection of human health is primary, not free trade. Once the Protocol came into force, Washington began to lobby African governments and institutions (among others) to accept GMO crops with minimal safety assessment, hoping their lack of institutional depth would allow them to be either fooled or corrupted. The USAID is assisting Regional Economic Communities in Africa to develop policies aimed not at ensuring biosafety, but at limiting regulation, which they consider to be a barrier to regional trade in GMO food and crops.

*The Swanby report documents how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation works hand-in-glove with USAID by funding organizations such as the African Agriculture Technology Foundation whose aim is to promote introduction of GMO crops into Africa. Gates also works closely with the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations in their Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, which pushes GMO crops as the wonder advance in biological science. If harvest failure, declining crop yields and mandatory use of highly toxic Roundup weed killer from Monsanto—which has been proven to kill cells in human embryos—can be called a biological wonder, we should perhaps see it through the eyes of eugenics advocates like Bill Gates and David Rockefeller who have dreamed of biochemical population reduction for decades.*

*In effect, we have the first African-American US President, through the US AID, in an alliance with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Monsanto to spread death and destruction of natural agriculture in Africa.*

Their dark secret is that they are wittingly trying to kill off the darker-skinned peoples of the African Continent. It is an old agenda of “stupid white male” European colonialists, but one now being imposed with the sophistication of Madison Avenue PR and mumbo-jumbo about the wonder of biotech GMO.

*Their only problem for Gates and company is that, fortunately, African people are not so stupid as Bill Gates or Barack Obama or his personal handler, another African-American, Susan E. Rice, who has blood of millions of Africans on her hands going back to her role in the US State Department as Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, and her responsibility for the Rwandan Genocide of more than one million Tutsis in 1994 under Bill Clinton.*

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

 0

Sent from my 4G LTE Device

 http://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503

“Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic

Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t

 
doomsday-vault-2

This article was first published in December 2007.

One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers.

In 2006 when most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty (see map).

On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group.

The seed bank is being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the vault’s relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible human activity.

*Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?

Anytime Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta get together on a common project, it’s worth digging a bit deeper behind the rocks on Spitsbergen. When we do we find some fascinating things.*

The first notable point is who is sponsoring the doomsday seed vault. Here joining the Norwegians are, as noted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the US agribusiness giant DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically-modified (GMO) plant seeds and related agrichemicals; Syngenta, the Swiss-based major GMO seed and agrichemicals company through its Syngenta Foundation; the Rockefeller Foundation, the private group who created the “gene revolution with over $100 million of seed money since the 1970’s; CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity through agriculture change.

CGIAR and ‘The Project’

As I detailled in the book, Seeds of Destruction1, in 1960 the Rockefeller Foundation, John D. Rockefeller III’s Agriculture Development Council and the Ford Foundation joined forces to create the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños, the Philippines. By 1971, the Rockefeller Foundation’s IRRI, along with their Mexico-based International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and two other Rockefeller and Ford Foundation-created international research centers, the IITA for tropical agriculture, Nigeria, and IRRI for rice, Philippines, combined to form a global Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR).

CGIAR was shaped at a series of private conferences held at the Rockefeller Foundation’s conference center in Bellagio, Italy. Key participants at the Bellagio talks were the Rockefeller Foundation’s George Harrar, Ford Foundation’s Forrest Hill, Robert McNamara of the World Bank and Maurice Strong, the Rockefeller family’s international environmental organizer, who, as a Rockefeller Foundation Trustee, organized the UN Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972. It was part of the foundation’s decades long focus to turn science to the service of eugenics, a hideous version of racial purity, what has been called The Project.

To ensure maximum impact, CGIAR drew in the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization, the UN Development Program and the World Bank. Thus, through a carefully-planned leverage of its initial funds, the Rockefeller Foundation by the beginning of the 1970’s was in a position to shape global agriculture policy. And shape it did.

Financed by generous Rockefeller and Ford Foundation study grants, CGIAR saw to it that leading Third World agriculture scientists and agronomists were brought to the US to ‘master’ the concepts of modern agribusiness production, in order to carry it back to their homeland. In the process they created an invaluable network of influence for US agribusiness promotion in those countries, most especially promotion of the GMO ‘Gene Revolution’ in developing countries, all in the name of science and efficient, free market agriculture.

Genetically engineering a master race?

Now the Svalbard Seed Bank begins to become interesting. But it gets better. ‘The Project’ I referred to is the project of the Rockefeller Foundation and powerful financial interests since the 1920’s to use eugenics, later renamed genetics, to justify creation of a genetically-engineered Master Race. Hitler and the Nazis called it the Ayran Master Race.

*The eugenics of Hitler were financed to a major extent by the same Rockefeller Foundation which today is building a doomsday seed vault to preserve samples of every seed on our planet. Now this is getting really intriguing. The same Rockefeller Foundation created the pseudo-science discipline of molecular biology in their relentless pursuit of reducing human life down to the ‘defining gene sequence’ which, they hoped, could then be modified in order to change human traits at will. Hitler’s eugenics scientists, many of whom were quietly brought to the United States after the War to continue their biological eugenics research, laid much of the groundwork of genetic engineering of various life forms, much of it supported openly until well into the Third Reich by Rockefeller Foundation generous grants.2*

The same Rockefeller Foundation created the so-called Green Revolution, out of a trip to Mexico in 1946 by Nelson Rockefeller and former New Deal Secretary of Agriculture and founder of the Pioneer Hi-Bred Seed Company, Henry Wallace.

The Green Revolution purported to solve the world hunger problem to a major degree in Mexico, India and other select countries where Rockefeller worked. Rockefeller Foundation agronomist, Norman Borlaug, won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work, hardly something to boast about with the likes of Henry Kissinger sharing the same.

In reality, as it years later emerged, the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme to develop a globalized agribusiness which they then could monopolize just as they had done in the world oil industry beginning a half century before. *As Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970’s, ‘If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population.’*

Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went hand-in-hand. They were part of a grand strategy which included Rockefeller Foundation financing of research for the development of genetic engineering of plants and animals a few years later.

John H. Davis had been Assistant Agriculture Secretary under President Dwight Eisenhower in the early 1950’s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an agriculture expert in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956, Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review in which he declared that “the only way to solve the so-called farm problem once and for all, and avoid cumbersome government programs, is to progress from agriculture to agribusiness.” He knew precisely what he had in mind, though few others had a clue back then— a revolution in agriculture production that would concentrate control of the food chain in corporate multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer. 3

*A crucial aspect driving the interest of the Rockefeller Foundation and US agribusiness companies was the fact that the Green Revolution was based on proliferation of new hybrid seeds in developing markets. One vital aspect of hybrid seeds was their lack of reproductive capacity. Hybrids had a built in protection against multiplication. Unlike normal open pollinated species whose seed gave yields similar to its parents, the yield of the seed borne by hybrid plants was significantly lower than that of the first generation.*

*That declining yield characteristic of hybrids meant farmers must normally buy seed every year in order to obtain high yields. Moreover, the lower yield of the second generation eliminated the trade in seed that was often done by seed producers without the breeder’s authorization. It prevented the redistribution of the commercial crop seed by middlemen. If the large multinational seed

companies were able to control the parental seed lines in house, no competitor or farmer would be able to produce the hybrid. The global concentration of hybrid seed patents into a handful of giant seed companies, led by DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred and Monsanto’s Dekalb laid the ground for the later GMO seed revolution. 4*

In effect, the introduction of modern American agricultural technology, chemical fertilizers and commercial hybrid seeds all made local farmers in developing countries, particularly the larger more established ones, dependent on foreign, mostly US agribusiness and petro-chemical company inputs. It was a first step in what was to be a decades-long, carefully planned process.

Under the Green Revolution Agribusiness was making major inroads into markets which were previously of limited access to US exporters. *The trend was later dubbed “market-oriented agriculture.” In reality it was agribusiness-controlled agriculture.*

Through the Green Revolution, the Rockefeller Foundation and later Ford Foundation worked hand-in-hand shaping and supporting the foreign policy goals of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and of the CIA.

*One major effect of the Green Revolution was to depopulate the countryside of peasants who were forced to flee into shantytown slums around the cities in desperate search for work. That was no accident; it was part of the plan to create cheap labor pools for forthcoming US multinational manufactures, the ‘globalization’ of recent years.*

When the self-promotion around the Green Revolution died down, the results were quite different from what had been promised. Problems had arisen from indiscriminate use of the new chemical pesticides, often with serious health consequences. The mono-culture cultivation of new hybrid seed varieties decreased soil fertility and yields over time. The first results were impressive: double or even triple yields for some crops such as wheat and later corn in Mexico. That soon faded.

The Green Revolution was typically accompanied by large irrigation projects which often included World Bank loans to construct huge new dams, and flood previously settled areas and fertile farmland in the process. Also, super-wheat produced greater yields by saturating the soil with huge amounts of fertilizer per acre, the fertilizer being the product of nitrates and petroleum, commodities controlled by the Rockefeller-dominated Seven Sisters major oil companies.

*Huge quantities of herbicides and pesticides were also used, creating additional markets for the oil and chemical giants. As one analyst put it, in effect, the Green Revolution was merely a chemical revolution. At no point could developing nations pay for the huge amounts of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. They would get the credit courtesy of the World Bank and special loans by Chase Bank and other large New York banks, backed by US Government guarantees.*

Applied in a large number of developing countries, those loans went mostly to the large landowners. For the smaller peasants the situation worked differently. Small peasant farmers could not afford the chemical and other modern inputs and had to borrow money.

Initially various government programs tried to provide some loans to farmers so that they could purchase seeds and fertilizers. Farmers who could not participate in this kind of program had to borrow from the private sector. Because of the exorbitant interest rates for informal loans, many small farmers did not even get the benefits of the initial higher yields. After harvest, they had to sell most if not all of their produce to pay off loans and interest. They became dependent on money-lenders and traders and often lost their land. Even with soft loans from government agencies, growing subsistence crops gave way to the production of cash crops.5

**Since decades the same interests including the Rockefeller Foundation which backed the initial Green Revolution, have worked to promote a second ‘Gene Revolution’ as Rockefeller Foundation President Gordon Conway termed it several years ago, the spread of industrial agriculture and commercial inputs including GMO patented seeds.

Gates, Rockefeller and a Green Revolution in Africa
With the true background of the 1950’s Rockefeller Foundation Green Revolution clear in mind, it becomes especially curious that the same Rockefeller Foundation along with the Gates Foundation which are now investing millions of dollars in preserving every seed against a possible “doomsday” scenario are also investing millions in a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.**

AGRA, as it calls itself, is an alliance again with the same Rockefeller Foundation which created the “Gene Revolution.” A look at the AGRA Board of Directors confirms this.

It includes none other than former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan as chairman. In his acceptance speech in a World Economic Forum event in Cape Town South Africa in June 2007, Kofi Annan stated, ‘I accept this challenge with gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and all others who support our African campaign.’

In addition the AGRA board numbers a South African, Strive Masiyiwa who is a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation. It includes Sylvia M. Mathews of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Mamphela Ramphele, former Managing Director of the World Bank (2000 – 2006); Rajiv J. Shah of the Gates Foundation; Nadya K. Shmavonian of the Rockefeller Foundation; Roy Steiner of the Gates Foundation. In addition, an Alliance for AGRA includes Gary Toenniessen the Managing Director of the Rockefeller Foundation and Akinwumi Adesina, Associate Director, Rockefeller Foundation.

To fill out the lineup, the Programmes for AGRA includes Peter Matlon, Managing Director, Rockefeller Foundation; Joseph De Vries, Director of the Programme for Africa’s Seed Systems and Associate Director, Rockefeller foundation; Akinwumi Adesina, Associate Director, Rockefeller Foundation. Like the old failed Green Revolution in India and Mexico, the new Africa Green Revolution is clearly a high priority of the Rockefeller Foundation.

While to date they are keeping a low profile, Monsanto and the major GMO agribusiness giants are believed at the heart of using Kofi Annan’s AGRA to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ the new euphemism for genetically engineered patented seeds. To date South Africa is the only African country permitting legal planting of GMO crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials. In 2005 Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted bio-safety legislation and key officials expressed their intentions to pursue research into GMO crops.

Africa is the next target in the US-government campaign to spread GMO worldwide. Its rich soils make it an ideal candidate. Not surprisingly many African governments suspect the worst from the GMO sponsors as a multitude of genetic engineering and biosafety projects have been initiated in Africa, with the aim of introducing GMOs into Africa’s agricultural systems. These include sponsorships offered by the US government to train African scientists in genetic engineering in the US, biosafety projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the World Bank; GMO research involving African indigenous food crops.

The Rockefeller Foundation has been working for years to promote, largely without success, projects to introduce GMOs into the fields of Africa. They have backed research that supports the applicability of GMO cotton in the Makhathini Flats in South Africa.

Monsanto, who has a strong foothold in South Africa’s seed industry, both GMO and hybrid, has conceived of an ingenious smallholders’ programme known as the ‘Seeds of Hope’ Campaign, which is introducing a green revolution package to small scale poor farmers, followed, of course, by Monsanto’s patented GMO seeds. 6

Syngenta AG of Switzerland, one of the ‘Four Horsemen of the GMO Apocalypse’ is pouring millions of dollars into a new greenhouse facility in Nairobi, to develop GMO insect resistant maize. Syngenta is a part of CGIAR as well.7

Sent from my 4G LTE Device
  • -Part II “Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

http://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503

 

Move on to Svalbard

Now is it simply philosophical sloppiness? What leads the Gates and Rockefeller foundations to at one and the same time to back proliferation of patented and soon-to-be Terminator patented seeds across Africa, a process which, as it has in every other place on earth, destroys the plant seed varieties as monoculture industrialized agribusiness is introduced? At the same time they invest tens of millions of dollars to preserve every seed variety known in a bomb-proof doomsday vault near the remote Arctic Circle ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future’ to restate their official release?

It is no accident that the Rockefeller and Gates foundations are teaming up to push a GMO-style Green Revolution in Africa at the same time they are quietly financing the ‘doomsday seed vault’ on Svalbard. The GMO agribusiness giants are up to their ears in the Svalbard project.

Indeed, the entire Svalbard enterprise and the people involved call up the worst catastrophe images of the Michael Crichton bestseller, Andromeda Strain, a sci-fi thriller where a deadly disease of extraterrestrial origin causes rapid, fatal clotting of the blood threatening the entire human species. In Svalbard, the future world’s most secure seed repository will be guarded by the policemen of the GMO Green Revolution–the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, Syngenta, DuPont and CGIAR.

The Svalbard project will be run by an organization called the Global Crop Diversity Trust (GCDT). Who are they to hold such an awesome trust over the planet’s entire seed varieties? The GCDT was founded by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and Bioversity International (formerly the International Plant Genetic Research Institute), an offshoot of the CGIAR.

The Global Crop Diversity Trust is based in Rome. Its Board is chaired by Margaret Catley-Carlson a Canadian also on the advisory board of Group Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux, one of the world’s largest private water companies. Catley-Carlson was also president until 1998 of the New York-based Population Council, John D. Rockefeller’s population reduction organization, set up in 1952 to advance the Rockefeller family’s eugenics program under the cover of promoting “family planning,” birth control devices, sterilization and “population control” in developing countries.

Other GCDT board members include former Bank of America executive presently head of the Hollywood DreamWorks Animation, Lewis Coleman. Coleman is also the lead Board Director of Northrup Grumman Corporation, one of America’s largest military industry Pentagon contractors.

Jorio Dauster (Brazil) is also Board Chairman of Brasil Ecodiesel. He is a former Ambassador of Brazil to the European Union, and Chief Negotiator of Brazil’s foreign debt for the Ministry of Finance. Dauster has also served as President of the Brazilian Coffee Institute and as Coordinator of the Project for the Modernization of Brazil’s Patent System, which involves legalizing patents on seeds which are genetically modified, something until recently forbidden by Brazil’s laws.

Cary Fowler is the Trust’s Executive Director. Fowler was Professor and Director of Research in the Department for International Environment & Development Studies at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. He was also a Senior Advisor to the Director General of Bioversity International. There he represented the Future Harvest Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) in negotiations on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources. In the 1990s, he headed the International Program on Plant Genetic Resources at the FAO. He drafted and supervised negotiations of FAO’s Global Plan of Action for Plant Genetic Resources, adopted by 150 countries in 1996. He is a past-member of the National Plant Genetic Resources Board of the US and the Board of Trustees of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico, another Rockefeller Foundation and CGIAR project.

GCDT board member Dr. Mangala Rai of India is the Secretary of India’s Department of Agricultural Research and Education (DARE), and Director General of the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR). He is also a Board Member of the Rockefeller Foundation’s International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), which promoted the world’s first major GMO experiment, the much-hyped ‘Golden Rice’ which proved a failure. Rai has served as Board Member for CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), and a Member of the Executive Council of the CGIAR.

Global Crop Diversity Trust Donors or financial angels include as well, in the words of the Humphrey Bogart Casablanca classic, ‘all the usual suspects.’ As well as the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, the Donors include GMO giants DuPont-Pioneer Hi-Bred, Syngenta of Basle Switzerland, CGIAR and the State Department’s energetically pro-GMO agency for development aid, USAID. Indeed it seems we have the GMO and population reduction foxes guarding the hen-house of mankind, the global seed diversity store in Svalbard. 8

Why now Svalbard?

We can legitimately ask why Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation along with the major genetic engineering agribusiness giants such as DuPont and Syngenta, along with CGIAR are building the Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic.

Who uses such a seed bank in the first place? Plant breeders and researchers are the major users of gene banks. Today’s largest plant breeders are Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta and Dow Chemical, the global plant-patenting GMO giants. Since early in 2007 Monsanto holds world patent rights together with the United States Government for plant so-called ‘Terminator’ or Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT). Terminator is an ominous technology by which a patented commercial seed commits ‘suicide’ after one harvest. Control by private seed companies is total. Such control and power over the food chain has never before in the history of mankind existed.

This clever genetically engineered terminator trait forces farmers to return every year to Monsanto or other GMO seed suppliers to get new seeds for rice, soybeans, corn, wheat whatever major crops they need to feed their population. If broadly introduced around the world, it could within perhaps a decade or so make the world’s majority of food producers new feudal serfs in bondage to three or four giant seed companies such as Monsanto or DuPont or Dow Chemical.

That, of course, could also open the door to have those private companies, perhaps under orders from their host government, Washington, deny seeds to one or another developing country whose politics happened to go against Washington’s. Those who say ‘It can’t happen here’ should look more closely at current global events. The mere existence of that concentration of power in three or four private US-based agribusiness giants is grounds for legally banning all GMO crops even were their harvest gains real, which they manifestly are not.

These private companies, Monsanto, DuPont, Dow Chemical hardly have an unsullied record in terms of stewardship of human life. They developed and proliferated such innovations as dioxin, PCBs, Agent Orange. They covered up for decades clear evidence of carcinogenic and other severe human health consequences of use of the toxic chemicals. They have buried serious scientific reports that the world’s most widespread herbicide, glyphosate, the essential ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide that is tied to purchase of most Monsanto genetically engineered seeds, is toxic when it seeps into drinking water.9 Denmark banned glyphosate in 2003 when it confirmed it has contaminated the country’s groundwater.10

The diversity stored in seed gene banks is the raw material for plant breeding and for a great deal of basic biological research. Several hundred thousand samples are distributed annually for such purposes. The UN’s FAO lists some 1400 seed banks around the world, the largest being held by the United States Government. Other large banks are held by China, Russia, Japan, India, South Korea, Germany and Canada in descending order of size. In addition, CGIAR operates a chain of seed banks in select centers around the world.

CGIAR, set up in 1972 by the Rockefeller Foundation and Ford Foundation to spread their Green Revolution agribusiness model, controls most of the private seed banks from the Philippines to Syria to Kenya. In all these present seed banks hold more than six and a half million seed varieties, almost two million of which are ‘distinct.’ Svalbard’s Doomsday Vault will have a capacity to house four and a half million different seeds.

GMO as a weapon of biowarfare?

Now we come to the heart of the danger and the potential for misuse inherent in the Svalbard project of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation. Can the development of patented seeds for most of the world’s major sustenance crops such as rice, corn, wheat, and feed grains such as soybeans ultimately be used in a horrible form of biological warfare?

The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy elite families such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920’s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics,’ the systematic killing off of undesired bloodlines. Margaret Sanger, a rapid eugenicist, the founder of Planned Parenthood International and an intimate of the Rockefeller family, created something called The Negro Project in 1939, based in Harlem, which as she confided in a letter to a friend, was all about the fact that, as she put it, ‘we want to exterminate the Negro population.’ 11

A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.

In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.

Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine. 12

Is it a coincidence that these same organizations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also involved in the Svalbard seed bank project? According to Prof. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, the Pentagon is ‘now gearing up to fight and win biological warfare’ as part of two Bush national strategy directives adopted, he notes, ‘without public knowledge and review’ in 2002. Boyle adds that in 2001-2004 alone the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare-related work, a staggering sum.

Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright estimates that over 300 scientific institutions and some 12,000 individuals in the USA today have access to pathogens suitable for biowarfare. Alone there are 497 US Government NIH grants for research into infectious diseases with biowarfare potential. Of course this is being justified under the rubric of defending against possible terror attack as so much is today.

Many of the US Government dollars spent on biowarfare research involve genetic engineering. MIT biology professor Jonathan King says that the ‘growing bio-terror programs represent a significant emerging danger to our own population.’ King adds, ‘while such programs are always called defensive, with biological weapons, defensive and offensive programs overlap almost completely.’ 13

Time will tell whether, God Forbid, the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Bank of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation is part of another Final Solution, this involving the extinction of the Late, Great Planet Earth.

Notes

1 F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction, Montreal, (Global Research, 2007).
2 Ibid, pp.72-90.
3 John H. Davis, Harvard Business Review, 1956, cited in Geoffrey Lawrence, Agribusiness, Capitalism and the Countryside, Pluto Press, Sydney, 1987. See also Harvard Business School, The Evolution of an Industry and a Seminar: Agribusiness Seminar,http://www.exed.hbs.edu/programs/agb/seminar.html.
4 Engdahl, op cit., p. 130.
5 Ibid. P. 123-30.
6 Myriam Mayet, The New Green Revolution in Africa: Trojan Horse for GMOs?, May, 2007, African Centre for Biosafety,www.biosafetyafrica.net.
7 ETC Group, Green Revolution 2.0 for Africa?, Communique Issue #94, March/April 2007.
8 Global Crop Diversity Trust website, inhttp://www.croptrust.org/main/donors.php.
9 Engdahl, op. cit., pp.227-236.
10 Anders Legarth Smith, Denmark Bans Glyphosates, the Active Ingredient in Roundup, Politiken, September 15, 2003, in organic.com.au/news/2003.09.15.
11 Tanya L. Green, The Negro Project: Margaret Sanger’s Genocide Project for Black American’s, inwww.blackgenocide.org/negro.html.
12 Engdahl, op. cit., pp. 273-275; J.A. Miller, Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?, HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June/July 1995, Volume 13, Number 8.
13 Sherwood Ross, Bush Developing Illegal Bioterror Weapons for Offensive Use,’ December 20, 2006, in www.truthout.org.


If you missed it above, it bares repeating. What does this mean to you right now, if you live in the US, Canada and Mexico?

2015-12-21-12-39-29

The Gates Foundation has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to AGRA, and in 2006 Robert Horsch was hired for the AGRA project. Horsch was a Monsanto executive for 25 years. In a nutshell, the project may be sold under the banner of altruism and “sustainability,” but in reality it’s anything but. It’s just a multi-billion dollar enterprise to transform Africa into a GM-crop-friendly continent.

Conflicts of Interest Abound

Gates’ philanthropic methods came under scrutiny back in August 2010, when it was discovered that The Gates Foundation had purchased 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock; dramatically increasing its previous holdings—and hence its financial conflicts of interest—in the biotech firm.


The strong connections to Monsanto cast serious doubt on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s (hundreds of millions of dollars) heavy funding of agricultural development in Africa and purported goal of alleviating poverty and hunger among small-scale farmers. Second, this investment represents an enormous conflict of interests.”

It would be naive to think that all these philanthropic collaborations are designed to solve any problem besides how to help Monsanto monopolize the WORLD’s food supply with expensive **patented GM seeds, and the HERBERCIDE to go with them** [and to further Bill Gates GLOBAL population culling agenda].

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/03/04/clueless-fabrication-on-gmo.aspx

2015-12-28 01.54.12

2015-12-28 02.16.03

2015-12-28 02.16.48

2015-12-28 02.18.01

2015-12-28 01.52.56

 

This may save you from getting early dead. Watch “”YES ! GMOs ARE DEFINITELY TOXIC” : DR THIERRY VRAIN” on YouTube

https://youtu.be/kVolljHmqEs

AND

GMOs, glyphosate and mitochondrial dysfunction

http://responsibletechnology.org/gmos-and-mitochondrial-dysfunction/

 

Watch “Mitrochondrial Dysfuntion and GMOs” on YouTube

https://youtu.be/MFX6vgVugew

AND

Gates says vaccines can help reduce WORLD population [Who will be left alive? The smart people]

In case you did not know and don’t care about evil geniuses and the above two podcasts:
We’re the ‘Weeds’ for Monsanto Roundup Weed Killer

Ref: This is worth reading: In the “publisher” link in above article:

Monsanto: The world’s poster child for corporate manipulation and deceit

http://m.naturalnews.com/news/029325_Monsanto_deception.html

 

More of what they don’t want you to know. [Finally a] Victory in Paris vs Monsanto GMO Cabal

Written By
Profile picture

Mal Roarke is a pseudonym...

@WHO I AM

“V” is For Voluntarist. “P” is for Proto-Typer, incrementally clarifying my path and my tools. “F” is for having Fun otherwise what’s the point?
WHERE I LIVE  The above and Mobile “C” for Connector, is where I am engaging in what is alive in me by choice as opposed to  programming, to give myself room to find the enlivening connection I want with myself and others without giving in or up. See Who I am link for more...

Published On

Connect

Connect Concierge

Next Up

Join The Discussion

17 Comments
  1. PG (Pierre-Guy) Veer 2015-12-22 , 3:53 am

    HE surely could have done more, but singling him out is dishonest. Yes, he is successful in many ways, but why should HE be the altruistic one? Why can’t he do selfish things HE likes?

  2. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-01-01 , 1:25 am

    Re: PG (Pierre-Guy) Veer
    2015-12-22 , 3:53 am

    “HE surely could have done more, but singling him out is dishonest. Yes, he is successful in many ways, but why should HE be the altruistic one? Why can’t he do selfish things HE likes?”

    Dear Readers who are more innocent than PG Veer who ignores facts. This irrationality cannot last forever. Denial of reality will get you early dead.

    Nothing to do with altruism or whether he is or not. That’s a red herring.  PG Veer is falling for objectivist line that Bill Gates is a hero.

    Hopefully extend your life as long as possible by seeing the facts. Then doing something about it. As best as you can.

    If you don’t think there is a problem no reason to seek a solution. So now you see the problem and you are overwhelmed? But PG (Pierre-Guy) Veer does not see the problem. He won’t be able to provide or suggest  solutions. 

    “Why can’t he do selfish things HE likes?”

    Because they violate the Non-Aggression Principle, that is why! 

  3. Lee Roesner 2016-01-01 , 12:43 pm

    “Hell, Gates cannot even keep computer viruses out of his own product. Why is he mucking around with real viruses?”….good one. When you find out the types of organizations he supports…he is a one scary person with a lot of power. He sure is not supporting individual freedom and liberty. Quite the opposite.

  4. Martin Brock 2016-01-01 , 3:30 pm

    A person can be a genius and a psychopath at the same time, but I don’t know why libertarians need reflexively either to defend or to disparage someone like Gates. The richest people are not the most libertarian. I don’t see much correlation at all. The richest know very well that liberty does not account for their riches. They know it much better than their apologists among self-described libertarians.

    States are not Robinhoods, robbing the rich to give to the poor. Even during the 20th century, characterized by rising state socialism, this understanding of statecraft was laughable. States seem more to rob common people to give to the rich while throwing bones to the poor.

  5. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-01-01 , 11:12 pm

    Cross Ref as it pertains to comments regarding NAP on
    https://kentforliberty.liberty.me/stupidity-has-consequences/

    Part I of II Re: “A person can be a genius and a psychopath at the same time, but I don’t know why libertarians need reflexively either to defend or to disparage someone like Gates”. 

    He is indeed a “psychopath”. Libertarians are supposed to be liberty lovers. And Bill Gates is definetly not a liberty lover. But he is indeed a “genius”.

    The grand scale Eugenics stuff he is involved in is a violation of Non Aggression Principle. Whether he is a sociopath or implictly ever was a capitalist still have to admire him for his virtues and condemn him for his faults. His faults have become too diabolical, treacherous and poisonous to overlook. 

    Yes, he is an psychopathic “genius”. Are their consequences to failing to integrate that?

    Re: “The richest people are not the most libertarian. I don’t see much correlation at all. The richest know very well that liberty does not account for their riches. They know it much better than their apologists among self-described libertarians”.

    J.J Hill built the Great Northern Railway without Govt subsidies. He was not treacherous, poisonous and EVIL. He did not violate the NAP. And so was a liberty lover.

    Re: “States are not Robinhoods, robbing the rich to give to the poor. Even during the 20th century, characterized by rising state socialism, this understanding of statecraft was laughable. States seem more to rob common people to give to the rich while throwing bones to the poor”.

    That’s why Gate is never going to be a liberty lover, he’s got the Govt in his pocket. He has used his gains to violate the individual rights of other people and that qualifies him to be called or labelled as monstrous and EVIL.

    These are all consequences of his disregard for NAP. Reason he does not adhere to Non Agression Principle is he is IMMORAL. He cares not a wit for the life of another human being except to control it. This is the age old attitude and morality of a master slave relationship.

    You can’t appreciate liberty if you don’t embrace the NAP. Liberty Lovers who don’t appreciate NAP is the “liberty” of a master to do what ever he wants with a slave. That’s not libertarian at all. Not the same as freedom from coercion. 

    It’s ironic that his victims on this very Web site implicitly and explicitly defend his non liberty oriented actions. 

    The apologist for Govt use same arguments regarding Bill Gates I.E. “Govt/Bill Gates PROVIDES some useful benefits and or they cancel out. Or who cares? 

    Those individuals that do not see thru this, are snookered, culled and made dependent on American patents (medicine and agriculture) thru Cronyism, Mercantilism and Fascism and those who benefit receive endorsements and heavy investments in them from the likes of the Gates Foundation, which in turn profits and furthers it’s agendas.

    Continued Part II of II.

  6. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-01-01 , 11:16 pm

    Part II of II. If you don’t make it possible to see or think there is a problem no reason to seek a solution. And won’t be able to provide or suggest solutions. 

    KISS. 

    Judge all Gates actions by the NAP. He comes up EVIL. He is not a liberty lover.

    If you are sloppy with application of NAP i.e. failing to judge individuals by adherence to the principle then that’s poisonous. They and many others fail to judge Bill Gates based on the NAP.

    It’s demonstrates why its important to understand and why need a political statement to make it possible to address difficulties of applying moral principle such as NAP. 

    A Covenant of Unanimous Consent article
    by Dennis Wilson 
    https://tinyurl.com/Whither-Now

    So NOW WHAT?

    In the end what can you do about this once you make it simple and possible to see violations of NAP? 

    You have got to find people you can trust to back you up in a community.
    https://connect.liberty.me/the-covenant-of-unanimous-consent/

    You can’t trust people like Lew Rockwell who sells out the NAP to gain an alleged benefit from Govt. I address that in the above link.

    SO NOW WHAT?

    Now back to this article! 

    How do you protect yourself from an Evil psychopathic “genius” who has figured out how to control the US Govt (it’s Attilas and WitchDoctors and other fascist states and creatures of the state) and Global Populations; –AND has applied all his “genius” skill and experience to make it “Profitable” for them to traffic and spread, fast and slow early death under all kinds of grand scale augmented memes, cover, deception and confusion and supplication and petitioning for the need for more! 

    For starters in case you did not know and don’t care about evil geniuses:
    “We’re the ‘Weeds’ for Monsanto Roundup Weed Killer”
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2015/11/06/we-re-the-weeds-for-monsanto-roundup-weed-killer/

    Ref: This is worth browsing/reading: In the “publisher” link in above article:

    Monsanto: The world’s poster child for corporate [Govt entity] manipulation and deceit
    http://m.naturalnews.com/news/029325_Monsanto_deception.html

    More of what they don’t want you to know. [Finally a] “Victory in Paris vs Monsanto GMO Cabal”
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/01/03/victory-in-paris-vs-monsanto-gmo-cabal/

    SO WHAT can you do for yourself NOW?

    I concur with and expand on Lee Roesner’s comment/observation
    and address his post with two podcasts at the end of my article
    Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide
    https://connect.liberty.me/bill-gates-genius-or-a-psychopath-you-decide-2/

    I’ll post the podcasts here: This may save you and loved ones from getting a fast and or slow early dead and a life surrounded by grief and despair. Watch “”YES ! GMOs ARE DEFINITELY TOXIC” : DR THIERRY VRAIN” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/kVolljHmqEs

    AND

    GMOs, glyphosate and mitochondrial dysfunction

    http://responsibletechnology.org/gmos-and-mitochondrial-dysfunction/

    Watch “Mitrochondrial Dysfuntion and GMOs” on YouTube [and Direct Alternative solutions you can personally take now to take back control of your health from poisonous corporations, individuals and their products].

    https://youtu.be/MFX6vgVugew

  7. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-02-09 , 9:16 pm

    Stefan Molyneux nails it. The Truth About The Zika Virus Outbreak « SGTreport – The Corporate Propaganda Antidote – Silver, Gold, Truth, Liberty, & Freedom

    http://sgtreport.com/2016/02/the-truth-about-the-zika-virus-outbreak/

    Ref: Something REALLY Wicked This Way Comes…
    https://connect.liberty.me/bill-gates-genius-or-a-psychopath-you-decide-2/

  8. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-03-30 , 9:19 pm

    Thank you Jimmy Riedelsperger posted an update 2 hours, 44 minutes ago

    California wines contain Monsanto’s toxic herbicide – YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGat5m27egg&list=WL&index=445
    A study has revealed that 10 popular California wines contain traces of the toxic herbicide glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s weed-killer Round…

    Comment:
    Wines from Napa, Sonoma and Mendocino contain weed killer

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/053483_glyphosate_organic_wine_weed_killer.html#ixzz44QIjqVB5

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/03/22/monsanto-glyphosate.aspx …our best bet for minimizing health risks from pesticide exposure is to avoid them in the first place, by eating organic as much as possible and investing in a good water filtration system for your home or apartment.

    75 percent of the German population has glyphosate residue in their urine.

    The majority of those tested had levels that were five times higher than the legal limit of drinking water, while one-third had levels that were between 10 and 42 times higher than the legal limit.11 A study of glyphosate residues by the Munich Environmental Institute also found glyphosate in 14 best-selling German beers.12

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/16/this-food-helps-you-to-detox-pesticides.aspx

    If you know you have been exposed to pesticides, the lactic acid bacteria formed during the fermentation of kimchi may also help your body break down pesticides.
    So including fermented foods like kimchi in your diet may also be a wise strategy to help detox the pesticides that do enter your body. One of the benefits of eating organic is that the foods will be free of GE ingredients — and this is key to avoiding exposure to toxic glyphosate.

    http://articles.mercola.com/fermented-foods.aspx

    Watch “Arsenic in California wine MEDIA HOAX exposed” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/jZp49O0sUhc

  9. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-04-09 , 5:51 am

    Little is known in the West about what Muammar Qaddafi did in Libya or, for that matter, in Africa and in the Arab world. Now, release of a new portion of Hillary Clinton’s emails as Secretary of State, at the time she was running Obama Administration war on Qaddafi, sheds dramatic new light on the background.

    It was not a personal decision of Hillary Clinton to eliminate Qaddafi and destroy his entire state infrastructure. The decision, it’s now clear, came from circles very high in the US money oligarchy. She was merely another Washington political tool implementing the mandate of those oligarchs. The intervention was about killing Qaddafi’s well-laid plans to create a gold-based African and Arabic currency to replace the dollar in oil trades.

    Hillary Emails, Gold Dinars and Arab Springs
    17.03.2016 Author: F. William Engdahl
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/03/17/hillary-emails-gold-dinars-and-arab-springs/

    Rarely does the world get a true look inside the corrupt world of Western oligarchs and the brazen manipulations they use to enhance their fortunes at the expense of the public good. The following comes from correspondence of the Hungarian-born billionaire, now naturalized American speculator, George Soros. The hacker group CyberBerkut has published online letters allegedly written by Soros that reveal him not only as puppet master of the US-backed Ukraine regime. They also reveal his machinations with the US Government and the officials of the European Union in a scheme where, if he succeeds, he could win billions in the plunder of Ukraine assets. All, of course, would be at the expense of Ukrainian citizens and of EU taxpayers.

    An American Oligarch‘s Dirty Tale of Corruption
    12.06.2015 Author: F. William Engdahl
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2015/06/12/an-american-oligarch-s-dirty-tale-of-corruption/

    There has been a silent coup d’etat of the monied class, an American oligarchy. Names such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Sheldon Adelson (main financier of Mitt Romney for President), the Koch Brothers (main financiers of the Tea Party political movement), George H.W. Bush and family. The top 1% have reshaped the fundamentals of American life, culture and above all politics

    Princeton makes it official — USA Has Become Oligarchy, No Democracy
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2014/11/11/princeton-makes-it-official-usa-has-become-oligarchy-no-democracy/

    “[T]he preferences of economic elites have far more independent impact upon policy change than the preferences of average citizens do … ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does in the United States.”

    America’s growing income disparity is not the inevitable result of impersonal forces like globalization or automation. It is the outcome of hundreds of trade, tax and regulatory measures that achieved the preferred outcome – enrichment – of economic elites who contribute to politicians.

    An Oligarchy Has Broken Our Democracy. It Must Be Dislodged
    By Mike Lofgren
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43975.htm

  10. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-09-18 , 10:03 pm Vote0

    Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just sold out to Big Pharma… says children should be forcibly injected with mercury at gunpoint… claims government ‘science’ overrides medical freedom

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/055097_Gary_Johnson_forced_immunizations_medical_freedom.html#ixzz4Ke1Ok1BG

    In the comments I found this

    Dennis Wilson John Galt
    22 days ago
    “I personally believe in vaccinations, and my children were vaccinated. But it is not for me to impose that belief on others.”

    You just contradicted yourself. And you are certainly unworthy of your chosen pseudonym!
    1 Reply

    Avatar
    HSMama Dennis Wilson
    19 days ago
    How did he contradict himself? Are you insinuating that a belief in “vaccine science” automatically equates to a belief in forced vaccination?
    Reply


    Avatar
    Dennis Wilson HSMama
    19 days ago
    He imposed his belief on others when he vaccinated his children.

    Many parents also unthinkingly impose their beliefs on their male children by having them circumcized. Fortunately, female circumcision is viewed in most cultures by its correct name: mutilation.

    Childhood vaccination and circumcision are unnecessary, invasive, irreversible and done without the victim’s informed consent.

    View — uploads.disquscdn.com
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f87eb10d9297057ecc32978c3cf753b3fcf85e5c81a3f40235a3419076978552.gif

    Ref: Why Libertarians Should Vigorously Oppose the Vaccine Program
    By D. Saul Weiner
    August 12, 2015
    See also many excellent links here
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/08/d-saul-weiner/oppose-the-vaccine-program/

    I was responding to and got on a moderation queue: https://wearelibertarians.liberty.me/gary-johnson-to-appear-on-60-minutes/

  11. Justin Hale 2016-09-19 , 5:51 pm Vote1

    @atlasaikido
    Mercury was removed from vaccines years ago and even then it was ethyl mercury which does not bioaccumulate like methyl mercury.

  12. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-09-20 , 3:51 am Vote0

    @justinhale

    PREAMBLE:

    The Vaccine Hoax is Over. Documents from UK reveal 30 Years of Coverup

    Andrew Baker ( FFN),- Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

    1. Known the vaccines don’t work
    2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
    3. Known they are a hazard to children
    4. Colluded to lie to the public
    5. Worked to prevent safety studies

    Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.

    http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

    Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), we know that vaccines are not a miracle of modern medicine. Any medical or government authority which insists vaccines prevent diseases is either ignorant of government documents (and endless studies) revealing the exact opposite or of the CDC’s attempts to hide the truth about vaccines from the public, or means harm to the public…

    ———————————–
    Is there thimerosal in childhood vaccines today?
    ———————————–

    Rebuttal of Misleading Statements By Justin Hale
    AND
    From Minnesota Department of Health Parents and Patients Handout:
    Thimerosal and Childhood Vaccines: What You Should Know

    By Tim Kasemodel, Minnesota Natural Health Legal Reform Project

    MDH: Since 2001, all routinely recommended vaccines (except for the flu vaccine) currently being made for administration to young children in the U.S. contain no thimerosal or only trace amounts.

    MNHLRP: This statement is misleading because it implies that “only trace amounts” of mercury in a vaccine, (which can mean as much as 2,000 parts per billion), is not a concern. Studies on the mercury in thimerosal have shown it to be toxic at much lower concentrations, causing cell impairment, damage and death. Using the terms “all” and “except” in the same sentence is not only misleading, it is simply bad grammar.

    It is important to note from the beginning the interchangeable use of the terms child, childhood, children, and young children without any clarification of the ages involved. The recommended childhood vaccine schedule is broken down into the birth to age 6 group, and the 7 to 17 group. While most of this handout relates only to the younger age group, it is not clearly stated. This could mislead a reader to believe reasonably enough that all of the information relates to children up thru age 17.

    What is Thimerosal?

    MDH: Thimerosal is an organic mercury-based preservative used in some vaccines, including some influenza vaccines. Thimerosal contains ethyl mercury. This is not the same as the methyl mercury found in fish or emitted by power plants. It has been used as a preservative since the 1930s to prevent contamination in vials containing multiple doses of a vaccine and other medical products. Federal agencies have guidelines to make sure no child will receive excessive mercury from childhood vaccines or other medical products. Thimerosal is also found in other medical products such as some throat and nose sprays.

    MNHLRP: Stating that ethyl mercury and methyl mercury are different with no explanation seems intended to mislead the reader into believe that ethyl mercury is safe. While federal agencies do have exposure guidelines, these are based on methyl mercury. There are no exposure guidelines based on ethyl mercury. The intentional separation of ethyl mercury from methyl mercury, yet at the same time using exposure guidelines for methyl mercury to assess the safety of ethyl mercury is misleading.

    The FDA’s justification for safety of thimerosal exposure for infants under current recommendations is that the total possible exposure of 28 micrograms by 7 months of age is “significantly below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calculated exposure guideline for methyl mercury of 65 micrograms during the first 6 months of life for a child in the fifth percentile body weight.” The word “during” indicates the calculation was made based on the daily weight of this baby multiplied by the daily exposure limit, calculated each day, then totaled after 6 months. However, the EPA exposure guidelines are 0.1 mcg per kilogram body weight per day. For a 20 pound infant, the 65 micrograms calculated to be safe by the FDA would be 72 times more than allowed that day. The 12.5 micrograms of mercury in each of the mandatory two flu shots is actually 14 times more than the EPA guidelines for the average 6 month old.

    This is the same as the FDA accepting that giving 8400 mgs of Tylenol (three 1 oz. bottles) all at one time at 6 months and another 8400 mgs at 7 months of age is “SAFE” because the baby could have received 43,200 mgs now that he is 180 days old.

    What is a trace amount?

    MDH: Thimerosal is still used in the early stages of manufacturing of a few vaccines to ensure the production line is sterile, but is removed through a purification process, with only a trace, or insignificant, amounts remaining. This is different than the few vaccines that contain thimerosal as a preservative. The thimerosal in vaccines is left in after production to prevent contamination when multi-dose vaccines are used.

    A few vaccines still contain a trace amount of thimerosal but manufacturers are working to remove this trace even though the FDA considers these vaccines to be thimerosal free.

    MNHLRP: Calling mercury concentrations of 600 to 2000 parts per billion “insignificant” is outright and patently false. Liquids with 200 ppb mercury or higher is considered hazardous waste. Mercury concentrations as low as one fifth of one part per billion have been shown to negatively affect enzymes necessary for the removal of mercury itself from the body. A fetus or newborn infant does not even have the ability to detoxify heavy metal exposure, so it remains with yet unstudied consequences. There is no evidence that shows that mercury exposure, of any kind or concentration, does not cause harm to living tissue.

    Stating that trace level mercury containing vaccines are “considered by the FDA to be preservative free” gives the impression that the FDA has rigorously tested thimerosal and proven it is safe at trace amounts, which they or the manufacturer have not done at all. In fact, the FDA has no substantive proof that thimerosal is safe at any dosage or concentration.

    Etc

    See Insightful Comments Here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/06/thimerosal-and.html

  13. Justin Hale 2016-09-20 , 6:39 pm

    @atlasaikido
    “Data show that the current U.S. vaccine supply is the safest in history.”

    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/index.html

  14. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-09-21 , 6:04 am

    @justinhale

    —————–
    Regarding: “Yeah, not accepting modern medicine is just stupid”. “And Because it’s not true. If you believe it is you’re an idiot”.
    —————–

    Indeed US Fascism is a most insidious mixture of the key ingredients while maintaining the necessary nuance to snooker the masses, the media, and the so-called respectable folks across the spectrum. America’s Unique Fascism Mises Daily: Friday, October 21, 2011 by Anthony Gregory http://mises.org/daily/5634

    As in literature and economics Bankruptcy is the solution at this point. Saying the people running the system are NOT ALL BAD and that WE [YOU] need to get Big Bird and Barney the Dinosaur or Rand’s John Galt to run the system is futile and hopeless. The System (Fascism) must be abandoned. ALL of it. NOT SOME of it.

    Rand clearly understood the ROLE of so-called good men in Statist positions–“It’s Not Personal; It’s Institutional”–which is WHY John Galt refused the post of Economic Czar. The VERY OPPOSITE of what the scientist Stadler did. This and her PEACEFUL solutions ARE supported by Ludwig Von Mises and their students…at Mises.org

    Indeed it IS the Statist who has NOT bothered to think of solutions that do NOT involve culling, waging war and enslaving other people. As pointed out in the following article: “…[watch] my fellow humans squirm when asked to think like a free people…” There is *No We*: Challenge the Premise. http://zerogov.com/?p=2334

    ——————
    Regarding: “Data show that the current U.S. vaccine supply is the safest in history.”
    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/index.html
    ——————-

    Thousands of articles to the contrary, dozens of good books and studies, and potential “common sense reasoning,” but… Justin Hale has never even seen nor question the measles chart, apparently?? (i.e. Measles was 98.6% dead by 1963 when the vaccination was released and is now very rare, unless inoculated with it!?)

    See prior chart moved forward to here
    View — uploads.disquscdn.com
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f87eb10d9297057ecc32978c3cf753b3fcf85e5c81a3f40235a3419076978552.gif

    Nor read the article, I provided  Why Libertarians Should Vigorously Oppose the Vaccine Program
    By D. Saul Weiner
    August 12, 2015
    See also many excellent links here
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/08/d-saul-weiner/oppose-the-vaccine-program/

    Nor the link:
    http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/the-thompson-transcripts-shocking-revelations-by-the-cdc-whistleblower/

    Nor the posted article as it relates to CDC and what it has in store for us:
    http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

    Nor addressed the post prior to that: They used a mercury based adjuvant called Thimerosal, which was mega dosed to infants (25,000 PPM per injection, which is well over 1000x the toxic adult dose) causing an estimated 1/56 kids to become autistic, vs. 1/25,000 30+ years ago… 13,000 US court cases with 3500 settlements to date, mainly for autism / auto immune diseases… It’s estimated that 1/10 children will be autistic by 2020 if this isn’t STOPPED??? The same adjuvant is also used now in FLU, etc. shots, BTW!

    “An adjuvant is a substance that is formulated as part of a vaccine to enhance its ability to induce protection against infection. Adjuvants assist in activating the immune system, allowing the antigens— pathogen components that elicit an immune reaction in vaccines, to stimulate a response that leads to long-term protection…”

    More Specifically along with the deceptive science… using methyl vs. ethyl mercury and misleading age and weight (which are still arbitrary guidelines, at best…) comparisons, makes the obvious point? (i.e. that they haven’t even DONE the studies on the compound/s used… then the paid- off in advance CDC, FDA rubber stamps the IP’d patent / TM / copywrite / s, to the tune of a hundreds millions $.USD bought and paid for corporate govt QUACKERY.

    Thimerosal is a MERCURY based (i.e. branded… so they could PATENT it, for profit) compound. Mercury causes the systems and results demonstrated in autism, auto immune diseases and a whole host of other ailments… most likely developed because of a “compromised” immune system / response… as does say, mercury amalgam dental filings, as another example of STUPIDITY in quack science and Industrial (waste). Fluoride is another excellent example. So is radioactive waste, Monsanto Roundup glycophosphate etc. The list, is very LONG…

    As for “mercury is not used as an adjuvant. Thimerosal, a compound including one form of mercury, does.” What part of “thimerosal” is basically rebranded MERCURY, used in massive amounts (i.e. 25,000 PPM per dose) given to INFANTS (as well as adults given flu inoculations, now…) doesn’t “click,” with you Justin Hale??? This IS the problem with “for profit” Fascist governments buying into quack “patented science” for PROFIT… The most basic “common sense” is thrown OUT, in favor of patented THICKET solutions…

    Your position Justin Hale is Debunked. Overwhelming evidence of the banality of evil!

    Ref: http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/06/08/what-media-hid-in-de-niro-autism-film-affair/

    http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/04/10/robert-de-niro-and-autism-a-tragic-drama-of-intimidation/

    http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/vaccine-denial-a-modest-proposal-to-reduce-the-controversy/

    http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/autism-vaccine-controversy-continues-with-data-coverup/

    http://www.thedailybell.com/asset-protection-strategies/anthony-wile-dr-andrew-wakefield-on-the-autismvaccine-controversy-and-his-ongoing-professional-persecution/

    http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/authorities-plan-strategic-attack-of-anti-vaccine-myths/

    ——————
    Addendum
    ——————

    Fool me once, shame on you.

    “You” in this case is the corporatist government that keeps violating the sacred trust of its citizenry.

    Fool me twice, shame on both of us.

    “Us” in this case is those of us who should have learned early on that a government that repeatedly lies, breaks the laws, overreaches its authority and abuses its power can’t be trusted.

    Fool others over and over and over again, shame on you.

    Shame on every politician, bureaucrat and technician etc who is a shill for the U.S. corp government’s abuses and lies, and shame on every gullible insouciant  American who keeps buying into the government’s propaganda, believing that it has our best interests at heart.

  15. Justin Hale 2016-09-21 , 6:43 am Vote0

    @atlasaikido
    Yeah, not accepting modern medicine is just stupid.

  16. Justin Hale 2016-09-21 , 7:40 am

    @atlasaikido
    Because it’s not true. If you believe it is you’re an idiot.

  17. Mal Roarke is a pseudonym... 2016-09-22 , 6:21 am Vote0

    Cross Ref Post as it pertains to some Comments regarding NAP on
    https://kentforliberty.liberty.me/stupidity-has-consequences/

    Part I of II Re: “A person can be a genius and a psychopath at the same time, but I don’t know why libertarians need reflexively either to defend or to disparage someone like Gates”. – Martin Brock 2016-01-01 , 3:30 pm

    He is indeed a “psychopath”. Libertarians are supposed to be liberty lovers. And Bill Gates is definetly not a liberty lover. But he is indeed a “genius”.

    The grand scale Eugenics stuff he is involved in is a violation of Non Aggression Principle. Whether he is a sociopath or implictly ever was a capitalist still have to admire him for his virtues and condemn him for his faults. His faults have become too diabolical, treacherous and poisonous to overlook. 

    Yes, he is an psychopathic “genius”. Are their CONSEQUENCES to failing to integrate that?

    Re: “The richest people are not the most libertarian. I don’t see much correlation at all. The richest know very well that liberty does not account for their riches. They know it much better than their apologists among self-described libertarians”. -Martin Brock 2016-01-01 , 3:30 pm

    J.J Hill built the Great Northern Railway without Govt subsidies. He was not treacherous, poisonous and EVIL. He did not violate the NAP. And so was a Liberty Lover.

    Re: “States are not Robinhoods, robbing the rich to give to the poor. Even during the 20th century, characterized by rising state socialism, this understanding of statecraft was laughable. States seem more to rob common people to give to the rich while throwing bones to the poor”. -Martin Brock 2016-01-01 , 3:30 pm

    That’s why Gate is never going to be a liberty lover, he’s got the Govt in his pocket. He has used his gains to violate the individual rights of other people and that qualifies him to be called or labelled as monstrous and EVIL.

    These are all consequences of his disregard for NAP. Reason he does not adhere to Non Agression Principle is he is IMMORAL. He cares not a wit for the life of another human being except to control it. This is the age old attitude and morality of a master slave relationship.

    You can’t appreciate liberty if you don’t embrace the NAP. Liberty Lovers who don’t appreciate NAP is the “liberty” of a master to do what ever he wants with a slave. That’s not libertarian at all. Not the same as freedom from coercion. 

    It’s ironic that his victims on this very Web site implicitly and explicitly defend his non liberty oriented actions. 

    The apologist for Govt use same arguments regarding Bill Gates I.E. “Govt/Bill Gates PROVIDES some useful benefits and or they cancel out. Or who cares? 

    Those individuals that do not see thru this, are snookered, culled and made dependent on American patents (medicine and agriculture) thru Cronyism, Mercantilism and Fascism and those who benefit receive endorsements and heavy investments in them from the likes of the Gates Foundation, which in turn profits and furthers it’s agendas.

    Continued Part II of II.
    Corporate Propaganda Antidote – Silver, Gold, Truth, Liberty, & Freedom

    http://sgtreport.com/2016/02/the-truth-about-the-zika-virus-outbreak/

    Ref: Something REALLY Wicked This Way Comes…
    https://connect.liberty.me/bill-gates-genius-or-a-psychopath-you-decide-2/

    ———————————–

    Part II of II. If you don’t make it possible to see or think there is a problem no reason to seek a solution. And won’t be able to provide or suggest solutions.

    KISS.

    Judge all Gates actions by the NAP. He comes up EVIL. He is not a liberty lover.

    If you are sloppy with application of NAP i.e. failing to judge individuals by adherence to the principle then that’s poisonous. They and many others fail to judge Bill Gates based on the NAP.

    It’s demonstrates why its important to understand and why need a political statement to make it possible to address difficulties of applying moral principle such as NAP.

    A Covenant of Unanimous Consent article
    by Dennis Wilson
    https://tinyurl.com/Whither-Now

    So NOW WHAT?

    In the end what can you do about this once you make it simple and possible to see violations of NAP?

    You have got to find people you can trust to back you up in a community.

    https://connect.liberty.me/the-covenant-of-unanimous-consent/

    You can’t trust people like Lew Rockwell who sells out the NAP to gain an alleged benefit from Govt. I address that in the above link.

    SO NOW WHAT?

    Now back to this article!

    How do you protect yourself from an Evil psychopathic “genius” who has figured out how to control the US Govt (it’s Attilas and WitchDoctors and other fascist states and creatures of the state) and Global Populations; –AND has applied all his “genius” skill and experience to make it “Profitable” for them to traffic and spread, fast and slow early death under all kinds of grand scale augmented memes, cover, deception and confusion and supplication and petitioning for the need for more!

    For starters in case you did not know and don’t care about evil geniuses:
    “We’re the ‘Weeds’ for Monsanto Roundup Weed Killer”
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2015/11/06/we-re-the-weeds-for-monsanto-roundup-weed-killer/

    Ref: This is worth browsing/reading: In the “publisher” link in above article:

    Monsanto: The world’s poster child for corporate [Govt entity] manipulation and deceit
    http://m.naturalnews.com/news/029325_Monsanto_deception.html

    More of what they don’t want you to know. [Finally a] “Victory in Paris vs Monsanto GMO Cabal”
    http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/01/03/victory-in-paris-vs-monsanto-gmo-cabal/

    SO WHAT can you do for yourself NOW?

    I concur with and expand on Lee Roesner’s comment/observation
    and address his post with two podcasts at the end of my article Bill Gates.. Genius or a Psychopath? You Decide

    I’ll post the podcasts here: This may save you and loved ones from getting a fast and or slow early dead and a life surrounded by grief and despair. Watch “”YES ! GMOs ARE DEFINITELY TOXIC” : DR THIERRY VRAIN” on YouTube

    https://youtu.be/kVolljHmqEs

    AND

    GMOs, glyphosate and mitochondrial dysfunction

    http://responsibletechnology.org/gmos-and-mitochondrial-dysfunction/

    Watch “Mitrochondrial Dysfuntion and GMOs” on YouTube [and Direct Alternative solutions you can personally take now to take back control of your health from poisonous corporations, individuals and their products].

    https://youtu.be/MFX6vgVugew


Thoughts? Comments?